user Digest 22 Jul 2009 23:52:27 -0000 Issue 8766

Topics (messages 200986 through 201006):

Re: Upgrading xWork??
 200986 by: Hoying, Ken
 200987 by: Haroon Rafique
 200988 by: Wes Wannemacher
 200989 by: Hoying, Ken
 200990 by: Hoying, Ken
 200994 by: Chris Pratt
 200995 by: Hoying, Ken
 200996 by: Chris Pratt
 201005 by: Martin Gainty

[U] Struts2 Portlet with Spring
 200991 by: Ginn, Timothy D Mr CTR USA TRADOC USAAC
 200993 by: Wes Wannemacher

s2 currency and internationalization
 200992 by: kaphilmore

studying struts2 framework, ActionInvocation question
 200997 by: Dimitrios Christodoulakis
 200999 by: Musachy Barroso
 201000 by: Dimitrios Christodoulakis
 201006 by: Martin Gainty

Re: How to fix this error.
 200998 by: Dave Newton

.action suffix - how to control it?
 201001 by: David C. Hicks
 201002 by: Martin Uhlir
 201003 by: Musachy Barroso
 201004 by: David C. Hicks

Administrivia:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To post to the list, e-mail: user@(protected)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-digest-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: user-digest-help@(protected)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

If I remember correctly there was a 2.0.5 that was probably compatible with
the 2.0.x versions of Struts 2, but I have no idea if that fix is in that
version.
(*Chris*)


On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Hoying, Ken <Ken_Hoying@(protected):

> We are running with Struts 2.0.1.1 (which uses xWork 2.0.4) and are
> noticing that we are getting hung threads sometimes on a HashMap call from
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.LocalizedTextUtil.
>
> It looks like the xWork code is question needs to be synchronized and is
> causing the threads to lock due to corruption in the HashMap. The problem
> code from xWork 2.0.4 is:
>
> private static MessageFormat buildMessageFormat(String pattern, Locale
> locale) {
>     MessageFormatKey key = new MessageFormatKey(pattern, locale);
>     MessageFormat format = (MessageFormat) messageFormats.get(key);
>     if (format == null) {
>        format = new MessageFormat(pattern);
>        format.setLocale(locale);
>        format.applyPattern(pattern);
>        messageFormats.put(key, format);
>     }
>
>     return format;
>   }
>
> I noticed that in later version of xWork this appears to have been fixed by
> the following change:
>
> private static MessageFormat buildMessageFormat(String pattern, Locale
> locale) {
>         MessageFormatKey key = new MessageFormatKey(pattern, locale);
>         MessageFormat format = null;
>         synchronized(messageFormats) {
>           format = (MessageFormat) messageFormats.get(key);
>           if (format == null) {
>              format = new MessageFormat(pattern);
>              format.setLocale(locale);
>              format.applyPattern(pattern);
>              messageFormats.put(key, format);
>           }
>         }
>
>         return format;
>      }
>
>
>
> So my question is, has anyone attempted to upgrade the xWork library to a
> later version in Struts 2.0.1.1? And if so, what version did you use and
> what was your experience?
>
> Thank you in advance!
> Ken
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> ***Note:The information contained in this message may be privileged
> and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of
> this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify the Sender
> immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
> computer. Thank you. Premier Inc.

I'd still suggest making your changes to the 2.0.5 source, since it most
likely has other bug fixes that you just haven't needed yet.
(*Chris*)

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Hoying, Ken <Ken_Hoying@(protected):

> I checked and it was not. Thank you though. It only seems to appear in
> the 2.1.x versions.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Pratt [mailto:thechrispratt@(protected)]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:08 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Upgrading xWork??
>
> If I remember correctly there was a 2.0.5 that was probably compatible with
> the 2.0.x versions of Struts 2, but I have no idea if that fix is in that
> version.
> (*Chris*)
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Hoying, Ken <Ken_Hoying@(protected)
> >wrote:
>
> > We are running with Struts 2.0.1.1 (which uses xWork 2.0.4) and are
> > noticing that we are getting hung threads sometimes on a HashMap call
> > from com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.LocalizedTextUtil.
> >
> > It looks like the xWork code is question needs to be synchronized and
> > is causing the threads to lock due to corruption in the HashMap. The
> > problem code from xWork 2.0.4 is:
> >
> > private static MessageFormat buildMessageFormat(String pattern, Locale
> > locale) {
> >     MessageFormatKey key = new MessageFormatKey(pattern, locale);
> >     MessageFormat format = (MessageFormat) messageFormats.get(key);
> >     if (format == null) {
> >        format = new MessageFormat(pattern);
> >        format.setLocale(locale);
> >        format.applyPattern(pattern);
> >        messageFormats.put(key, format);
> >     }
> >
> >     return format;
> >   }
> >
> > I noticed that in later version of xWork this appears to have been
> > fixed by the following change:
> >
> > private static MessageFormat buildMessageFormat(String pattern, Locale
> > locale) {
> >         MessageFormatKey key = new MessageFormatKey(pattern, locale);
> >         MessageFormat format = null;
> >         synchronized(messageFormats) {
> >           format = (MessageFormat) messageFormats.get(key);
> >           if (format == null) {
> >              format = new MessageFormat(pattern);
> >              format.setLocale(locale);
> >              format.applyPattern(pattern);
> >              messageFormats.put(key, format);
> >           }
> >         }
> >
> >         return format;
> >      }
> >
> >
> >
> > So my question is, has anyone attempted to upgrade the xWork library
> > to a later version in Struts 2.0.1.1? And if so, what version did you
> > use and what was your experience?
> >
> > Thank you in advance!
> > Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > ***Note:The information contained in this message may be privileged
> > and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
> > message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> > responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
> > are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
> > this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> > communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by
> > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank
> > you. Premier Inc.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
>
>

i'm running xwork-2.1.4

private static final Map<MessageFormatKey, MessageFormat> messageFormats = new HashMap<MessageFormatKey, MessageFormat>();
private static MessageFormat buildMessageFormat(String pattern, Locale locale)
{
    MessageFormatKey key = new MessageFormatKey(pattern, locale);
    MessageFormat format = null;
    synchronized (messageFormats)
    {
       format = (MessageFormat) messageFormats.get(key);
       if (format == null) {
          format = new MessageFormat(pattern);
          format.setLocale(locale);
          format.applyPattern(pattern);
          messageFormats.put(key, format);
       }
    }
    return format;
  }
//same as your latest version
can you display the synchronisation errors from the log?

thanks,
Martin
______________________________________________
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité

Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.




> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:39:02 -0700
> Subject: Re: Upgrading xWork??
> From: thechrispratt@(protected)
> To: user@(protected)
>
> I'd still suggest making your changes to the 2.0.5 source, since it most
> likely has other bug fixes that you just haven't needed yet.
>  (*Chris*)
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Hoying, Ken <Ken_Hoying@(protected):
>
> > I checked and it was not. Thank you though. It only seems to appear in
> > the 2.1.x versions.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Pratt [mailto:thechrispratt@(protected)]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:08 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: Upgrading xWork??
> >
> > If I remember correctly there was a 2.0.5 that was probably compatible with
> > the 2.0.x versions of Struts 2, but I have no idea if that fix is in that
> > version.
> > (*Chris*)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Hoying, Ken <Ken_Hoying@(protected)
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > We are running with Struts 2.0.1.1 (which uses xWork 2.0.4) and are
> > > noticing that we are getting hung threads sometimes on a HashMap call
> > > from com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.LocalizedTextUtil.
> > >
> > > It looks like the xWork code is question needs to be synchronized and
> > > is causing the threads to lock due to corruption in the HashMap. The
> > > problem code from xWork 2.0.4 is:
> > >
> > > private static MessageFormat buildMessageFormat(String pattern, Locale
> > > locale) {
> > >     MessageFormatKey key = new MessageFormatKey(pattern, locale);
> > >     MessageFormat format = (MessageFormat) messageFormats.get(key);
> > >     if (format == null) {
> > >        format = new MessageFormat(pattern);
> > >        format.setLocale(locale);
> > >        format.applyPattern(pattern);
> > >        messageFormats.put(key, format);
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     return format;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > I noticed that in later version of xWork this appears to have been
> > > fixed by the following change:
> > >
> > > private static MessageFormat buildMessageFormat(String pattern, Locale
> > > locale) {
> > >         MessageFormatKey key = new MessageFormatKey(pattern, locale);
> > >         MessageFormat format = null;
> > >         synchronized(messageFormats) {
> > >           format = (MessageFormat) messageFormats.get(key);
> > >           if (format == null) {
> > >              format = new MessageFormat(pattern);
> > >              format.setLocale(locale);
> > >              format.applyPattern(pattern);
> > >              messageFormats.put(key, format);
> > >           }
> > >         }
> > >
> > >         return format;
> > >      }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So my question is, has anyone attempted to upgrade the xWork library
> > > to a later version in Struts 2.0.1.1? And if so, what version did you
> > > use and what was your experience?
> > >
> > > Thank you in advance!
> > > Ken
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > ***Note:The information contained in this message may be privileged
> > > and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
> > > message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> > > responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
> > > are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
> > > this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> > > communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by
> > > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank
> > > you. Premier Inc.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
> >
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Celebrate the moment with your favorite sports pics. Check it out.
http://www.windowslive.com/Online/Hotmail/Campaign/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_QA_HM_sports_photos_072009&cat=sports

does vi have breakpoints.. am i missing something?

if you need to run this outside of an ide either use Logger.debug(variable);
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/tips/mills/Struts-logging.html

or debug
before craig and ted left (i wished they both stayed but thats another topic)
a DebuggingInterceptor was coded and is activated by
struts.devMode = true
http://struts.apache.org/2.0.14/docs/debugging.html

then address would contain ?debug=<parameter> in url should specifies either
?debug=xml or ?debug=console to the URL.

HTH
Martin Gainty
______________________________________________
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité

Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.




> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:17:50 -0700
> Subject: Re: studying struts2 framework, ActionInvocation question
> From: musachy@(protected)
> To: user@(protected)
>
> The best way to find out all these things is to put breakpoints in the
> constructor and/or the setter methods.
>
> musachy
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dimitrios
> Christodoulakis<dimi.chr@(protected):
> > Hello,
> >
> > According to the XWork feature description,
> > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/wikidocs/XWork%20Features.html, the
> > ActionInvocation represents the execution state of an action holding
> > the action instance and the interceptors.
> >
> > I have been looking at
> > http://struts.apache.org/2.1.6/struts2-core/apidocs and examining an
> > implementation of the ActionInvocation interface:
> > DefaultActionInvocation and was wondering how does this class gets a
> > hold of the action instance and the interceptors? It has relevant
> > fields like action, interceptors and proxy with getters for the action
> > and the proxy. But it is not straightforward to me how the action
> > instance (and the interceptors) are injected to it.. I didn't see
> > setter methods for the action.
> >
> > My motivation for this question comes also from wanting to unit test
> > an interceptor's intercept(ActionInvocation actionInvocation) method.
> > I will need to pass an ActionInvocation as a parameter, which then the
> > interceptor will use to extract the actual action instance from.
> > (Among other things, like the InvocationContext to get the session).
> >
> > So I was also wondering how to provide a mock-type of an
> > ActionInvocation which will contain a mock action, a mock session etc.
> > I mean I understand how to create a mock action and a mock session map
> > with some parameters in it, but how do I bind those to a mock
> > ActionInvocation? Would I need perhaps to start with a mock
> > ActionProxy?
> >
> > Thanks for your advice. This will help me design the test case and
> > also learn more about the struts2 mechanics.
> > Regards!
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
>

_________________________________________________________________
Bing™ brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try it now.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurants&form=MLOGEN&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TXT_MLOGEN_Local_Local_Restaurants_1x1

Thanks for the input, guys. It appears to work fine on my development
box. I'm re-running my automated build/test cycle to see what happens
when it gets deployed to Tomcat.
Much appreciated!
Dave

Musachy Barroso wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Martin Uhlir<stoupa91devel@(protected):
>  
>> struts.action.extension=,,
>> in struts.properties which suppress generating of the suffix for your
>> actions.
>>  
>
> I wrote like 2 paragraphs just to say that :), good thing I didn't send it.
>
> musachy
>
>