Java Mailing List Archive

http://www.gg3721.com/

Home » users.tapestry »

Re: Name of application module class too complicated?

Robert Hailey

2010-03-10

Replies: Find Java Web Hosting

Author LoginPost Reply

On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:

> Seems like we keep hitting the error where people change web.xml,
> rename their filter, and are confused that their AppModule is no
> longer loaded.

That is precisely my issue! IT WORKS! Thanks.

> I think the way that T5 locates the module class from the filter name
> is over-engineered.
>
> I think it should just be fixed as "AppModule", in the services
> package, end of story.
>
> Thoughts?

Is there utility in a multi-module tapestry app?

The other possibility would be to fail to initialize if it does not
find the *Module.class it expects? I would have caught on if there was
an exception like "cannot locate class: %{prefix}/services/
[MyKillerApp]Module", and whereas the vast majority of security
measures would be dependent on the contents of the class being able to
casually "unlink" it in a config file is a bit disconcerting.

Thanks again!

--
Robert Hailey

>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@(protected)

©2008 gg3721.com - Jax Systems, LLC, U.S.A.