Java Mailing List Archive

http://www.gg3721.com/

Home » users.tapestry »

Re: Name of application module class too complicated?

Robert Hailey

2010-03-11

Replies: Find Java Web Hosting

Author LoginPost Reply

On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Howard Lewis Ship
> <hlship@(protected):
>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Josh Canfield <joshcanfield@(protected)
>> > wrote:
>>> I've always just used AppModule...
>>>
>>> How about:
>>> look for <FilterName>Module
>>> look for AppModule
>>> Throw exception "can't find <FilterName>Module or AppModule"
>>>
>>
>> That's making it more complicated, not less.
>
> What Josh propose is the best way for handling this, let users who
> read doc use what they learned and help lazy users start with T5.

I agree. I think the only question is wither to throw the exception or
simply log something.

>
> By my point of view this is a non-issue at all and could definitely be
> kept the way it's now, what should be avoided is breaking current and
> correct working code.

But apparently it is an issue or else users of the framework would not
be running into it. Specifically, the issue is that the "filter-name"
parameter does not logically imply a connection to "module-controller-
name" for beginners (-:like me:-).

--
Robert Hailey

> --
> Massimo
> http://meridio.blogspot.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@(protected)

©2008 gg3721.com - Jax Systems, LLC, U.S.A.